LLD101

[Tridge]

Linkies:
http://www.papimi.gr/safe-hiv/AppendixE.htm <---full research paper http://www.excel.net/~jaguar/experiments.html <---abbreviated paper http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microelectricitygermkiller/ <----how to make devices yourself. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Beck-n-stuff/ <---user groups of electromed http://rense.com/general44/russell.htm <---Cancer caused by microbes http://www.bolenreport.com/articles/timbolen.html <---background to suppression More general information can be found by typing 'BLOOD ELECTRIFICATION' or 'BECK PROTOCOL' in web browser.

cancer: http://www.prep4usmle.com/community/viewtopic.php?p=62846#62846

Dear Sirs Passing 50 to 100 microamperes of simple d.c. electrical current through Aids infected blood disables the Aids virus and stops it reproducing it was discovered in 1992. It also works on a broad range of other viruses/bacteria including Hep-A,B,C and also quite importantly for maleria.see below.
BLOOD ELECTRIFICATION. Research conducted at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave., Bronx, N.Y.10461 in New York but researchers forced to keep quiet after being threatened by the pharmaceutical companies who would lose many 100 of billions of dollers if the method came into wide spread use.Remember an Aids person is a revenue stream for an average of 5 years of between $5000 to $20000 per person per year for the pharmaceutical industry.

PRACTICAL APPLICATION. Remember it is simple electrical current nothing else that disable the virii/pathogens.In the case of the Aids virii the electrical current stops it reproducing and the bodys immune system removes the remaining virii. The level of the current is very low, 25 milliamps is required to electrocute a person.These devices only use 0.3 milliamps to 1 milliamp maximum.This is much less than a Tens device.1 milliamp is 0.001amps. 1 microampere is 0.000001 amps. No money can be made from such devices which are very cheap and easy to produce. No expensive toxic drugs with dangerous side effects are involved. The practical device to neutralise Aids inside the body consists of two 0.5cm by 2cm long electrodes wrapped in wet cotton or alternatively conductive foam attached to wrist pulse points or other major artery points and then a direct current of 300 microamperes TO 1000 microamperes (0.3 Milliamps to 1 Milliamps MAX to allow for losses through the skin) is passed through the electrodes and then through the blood.The curent maybe adjusted to suit the condition or individuals. It is important to use these particular electrode dimensions as the current density must be maintained at 4 to 9 microamperes per square millimetre of electrode.The higher currents near 1 milliamp produce more rapid results. Every 5 minutes the current direction is reversed to prevent possible electrolysis.The voltage required to drive this current is from 20 to 40 volts max depending on skin resistance. Four 9 volt batteries in series would be sufficent.In poorer countries three 12 volt car batteries can be used in series. Application times vary from 20 minutes to up to an hour or more daily depending on condition.

BLOOD ELECTRIFICATION RESULTS. At Beck-n-Stuff and Microelectricitygermkiller a number of private individuals have tried it for a number of viral/bacterial conditions including Aids, Malaria, Cfs, lymphomas and other Cancers with excellent results backed up by blood tests have submitted reports.The devices are very easy to make yourself and instructions are included at the links below. Also remember cancers are caused by virii, bacteria and fungi and parasites and is contagious as a result. Check it for yourself by typing 'cancer microbe' in search engine Google for many hundreds of research papers.The mainstream medical establishment continues to deny this as it would be an admission of their closed minds over the decades.In the same way they denied for 20 years that their was a link between stomach ulcers and the bacterium Heliobactor Pylori. Thats why the incidence of cancer has risen to 1 in 3 now and continues to rise with no cure being found for the last 60 years and no cure in sight and the medical establishment denying that it is caused by viruses/microbes due to their entrenched position. Last year 126 000 people in the U.K died from cancer and 36 000 died from pharmaceutical drug side effects. In the U.S. 2445040 people died from pharmaceutical drug side effects alone last year. More information as well as original research at below sites. The method is not confined to Aids only but has a broad spectrum of uses which is why the pharmaceutical companies are desperate to keep it hidden. You have to type these complex links EXACTLY as otherwise they wont work or copy/paste. http://www.papimi.gr/safe-hiv/AppendixE.htm <---full research paper http://www.excel.net/~jaguar/experiments.html <---abbreviated paper http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microelectricitygermkiller/ <----how to make devices yourself. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Beck-n-stuff/ <---user groups of electromed http://rense.com/general44/russell.htm <---Cancer caused by microbes http://www.bolenreport.com/articles/timbolen.html <---background to suppression

More general information can be found by typing 'BLOOD ELECTRIFICATION' or 'BECK PROTOCOL' in web browser.

Below is a easy to understand version of the original paper.Look at the graphs and tables below. The BBC Horizon programme showed the futility of making vaccines for Aids viruses recently due to multi varient strains.Think of all the people who could have been saved since 1992 but due to this suppression have died.Also the Aids virus is spreading due to increased promiscuity in the general population. I ask you to bring this knowledge to public awareness and for you to ask governmnent officals some searching questions after studying the research papers above and below carefully. It is very important that the below research paper is read a few times over and over again to make it clear in your own mind. Once again it is simple direct electrical current that disables pathogens in the blood. A research project by a small company in Africa showed blood electrification eeffectiveness on malaria as detailed below.The test is impossible to conduct in U.S.A due to interference by vested interests.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lab Test Results of HIV inactivation by electric current from Appendix E Paper by W. Lyman, et al. Reporting Inactivation of AIDS Virus by Electric Current William D. Lyman, Irwin R.Merkatz William C. Hatch and Steven C. Kaali Departments of Pathology, and Obstetrics & Gynecology Albert Einstein. College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave., Bronx, N.Y.10461

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS Overview: A non-flow vessel or cell included a pair of platinum electrodes 1 mm apart inserted into a well 1.56 mm in length and 8.32 mm in depth. The non-flow vessel was connected to a direct current source capable of creating an electric field at a constant voltage and constant amperage. Into this well was laced a suspension of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) at a concentration of 1,000,000 infectious particles per ml. An aliquot of approximately 10 ul of the virus suspension was placed into the well. Thereafter, the viral suspension was exposed to direct currents ranging from 0 microamps (uA) for up to 12 minutes, to 100 microamps for up to 6 minutes. Intermediate currents of 25, 50 and 75 microamps were used to expose similar viral aliquots. After exposure of the viral suspension to electric currents, the contents of the non-flow vessel were removed and placed into sterile microtubes. 5 ul of each sample were removed and diluted with 95 ul tissue culture medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS. unborn calf blood) In Experiment 1, the resuspended and treated viral stocks were incubated with a human T lymphoblastoid cell line named CEM-SS. This cell line, upon exposure to HIV-1, forms syncytia (giant cells). It is well documented that the viral titer (amount) used is directly correlated with the number of syncytia formed. Therefore, evaluation of infectivity of HIV-1 can be used with this assay. In contrast, Experiment No. 2 used a differnet human T lymphoblastoid cell line named H9. This cell line, in contrast to CEM-SS cells, produces, upon exposure to HIV-1, many viral particles. The amount of virus produced is proportional to the amount of virus to which the cells are exposed. Therefore, quantitation of viral particles, or more commonly associated viral protein (in this case reverse transcriptase), can be used as an index of viral infection. In both assays, the CEM syncytia forming assay and the H9 viral protein assay, similar type results were obtained. That is, with the CEM cells, although syncytium formation and quantitation is preferrable, one can quantitate the HIV-1 associated protein (reverse transcriptase) activity and conversely with the H9 cells, although reverse transcriptase quantitation is preferred, one can quantitate giant cell (syncytia) formation. Both of these assays are widely used as reproducible measures of viral infection and can be used to determine if alterations in viral infectivity as a product of this electrical treatment can be detected.

Experiment #1 Approximately 100,000 CEM-SS cells per sample were incubated with a treated or untreated (control) viral aliquot for up to 4 days. The cells were placed into microtiter plate wells and monitored for formation of syncytia every 24 hours by microscopic observation. In a standardized fashion, as it has been reported in the literature and is currentlybeing conducted in many laboratories, the number of syncytia at 3 and 4 days was determined. Table 2 summarizes the results from a representative experiment using this assay. As can be noted, the number of syncytia formed was inversely proportional to the amount of electric current. That is, additionally, with increased current (100 vs 50 uA) there was a reduction in the number of syncytia formed. These results and those of additional experiments using the CEM-SS cell line indicate a consistent finding that electrical treatment of the RF strain of HIV-1 attentuates the virus potential for inducing syncytium formation in this cell line.

Experiment #2 A separate and independent assay to determine the ability of electric current to alter HIV-1 infectivity using H9 cells was employed. The basic strategy was similar to that used for the CEM cells with the exception that the initial suspension of treated and controlled (non-treated) viral stock was incubated with 100,000 H9 cells for 2 hours at 37 degees Celsius. Thereafter, the cell virus suspensions were further diluted to 5 ml in standard tissue culture medium. The cell-viral suspensions were then incubated for up to 14 days at 37 degrees Celsius with 5% carbon dioxide. At 3 day intervals (beginning at day 2), aliquots of cell suspension were removed from each sample. The aliquots were centrifuged at 1,000 rpm for 5 minutes in order to pellet the cells. After centrifugation, the supernatant and cell pellets were seperated. The supernatant was cyropreserved for subsequent reverse transcriptase assay and the cell pellets were resuspended in fixatives and maintained in a tissue bank for additional studies employing in situ hybridization and immunocytochemistry to detect qualitatively and semi-qualitatively viral infection by HIV-1. At the end of each experiment, the supernatant samples from each of the tests and time points were examined using standard reverse transcriptase assay. The results of the representative experiment are shown in Table 3. The results of this experiment indicate the ability of HIV-1 to infect H9 cells is attenuated by the magnitude of the electrical currents to which the virus is exposed. Additionally, at lower current magnitude, but with prolonged exposure time, attenuation of viral infectivity is achieved. That is, analogous to the results observed using syncytium formation and the CEM-SS cell line, either increased current or increased duration of exposure time was inversely proportional to the amount of reverse transcriptase produced by the cell line. In conclusion, these experiments which have been repeated several times, and those using the CEM-SS cell line, indicate at a statistically significant level that direct electrical current at biocompatible amperages for discrete exposure time intervals can attenuate the ability of HIV-1 to infect normally healthy cells which are susceptible to the HIV-1 AIDS virus. T

ABLE 2 Syncytium Formation ------------------------------------------ Dilution of virus (Number of Syncytia) -------- -------------------------------- 1:20 TNTC TNTC 28 66 15 1:40 TNTC 175 22 42 7 1:80 TNTC 90 20 25 4 1:160 180 44 9 9 2 1:320 115 28 4 6 0 1:640 70 10 0 2 0 1:1280 40 7 0 0 0 1:2560 28 4 0 0 0 1:5120 15 2 0 0 0 1:10,240 10 1 0 0 0 1:20,480 4 0 0 0 0 ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ 0uA 25uA 50uA 75uA 100uA --------------------------------------------- (TNTC=too numerous to count)

TABLE 3 Reverse Transcriptase Activity (count per million x .001) ------------------------------------- Days of Incubation ------------------ uAmps/Time(min.) 2 days 4 days ---------------- ------- ------ 0/6 0 13.8 0/12 0 11.7 50/3 0 9.1 50/6 0 9.1 50/12 0 4.8 100/3 0 5.7 100/6 0 3.6 ------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BELOW IS RECENT TEST ON MALARIA. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subj: [microelectricitygermkiller] SOTA's Clinical Trial Results on Malaria Date: 05-Aug-03 11:04:49 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: russ@sotainstruments.com (sotainstruments) Reply-to: microelectricitygermkiller@yahoogroups.com To: microelectricitygermkiller@yahoogroups.com

Hello Group, Below is a copy of an e-mail that SOTA has sent to Spectrum magazine. I thought it would be also appropriate to share this with some of the BECK chat lines. Please feel free to copy it and pass it on to whomever you wish. It is time to get the word out. We are not making ANY claims here! We are simply sharing the results of our clinical trials. Please draw your own conclusions, as free individuals with free will and sound minds. I only wished that Dr. Bob Beck could be here (physically) to see the fruits of his labour. Sincerely, Russell Torlage, SOTA Instruments Inc. ******************************************************

Hello everyone at Spectrum Magazine (http://www.thespectrumnews.org) We so very much enjoy your magazine, and we were pleasantly surprised to find this month's Spectrum with an article on Bob Beck's great work (August 2003) Thank you for the kind words about our company. In future if you are planning any follow-ups to Bob's work may we suggest you contact us ahead of time? We are working on many things to bring Bob's work to the world and we would be happy to share with you up-to-date research etc. We've recently concluded a small trial we conducted in conjunction with a medical doctor in Nigeria. We have not shared this publicly as of yet and most likely won't until we can get a second trial done. [SOTA has decided to share on BECK chat lines.] However, we decided to share this with you and if you so choose your readers. We see Spectrum as being on the cutting edge... As many of your readers know, it is very expensive and very difficult to get medical studies done in North America. However, because of the current situation in Africa, where so many people are sick, government regulatory bodies are easing up the requirements and, of course, the cost of doing studies there are not near so costly. SOTA relies on doctors who have been exposed to the BECK Protocol to approach us about conducting a study. When that happens, a practitioner's heart is in the right place and money is not the primary issue. When we pursue a researcher to do a study, the costs quoted are prohibitive for us at this time.

MALARIA
A Medical Doctor in Nigeria contacted us in 2001 asking if the blood electrification aspect of the BECK Protocol was effective against Malaria. We told him we didn't know but it could be. We sent him a unit to try on one person who was willing to try it and whose life would not be put into danger by trying it. About two months later we heard back from him?the units had been effective with malaria in 5 out of 6 people. Then we began the long journey (almost eighteen months) of putting together a proper small trial study. The Nigerian government gave us a letter of support. Unfortunately due to cultural differences everything took a lot longer to accomplish. We learned much about patience. In the end, we decided to stop the study prematurely (we were originally hoping to have 60 people included in the trial). When we stopped the trial, 37 people had been enrolled. Stopping prematurely meant that several of them had not finished the protocol or the testing. Another limitation was the fact once people tested negative for malaria, they no longer returned to complete testing and lab work (they were well so why keep returning to the doctor). Of the 37 people, 12 were women and 25 were men. The age range was from 18 to 38. Subjects were either asymptomatic or symptomatic with malaria. We were unable to test the protocol on individual's with resistant malaria cases. The type of malaria was P. Falciparum, known to be the worst strain. Blood Electrification was administered daily for one hour until lab work showed negative for malaria. Each person was to be tested for malaria on days 0, 3, 7, 14 and 28. Only 8 people completed all the testing. Of these 7 tested negative for malaria and 1 still tested for malaria. 14 people completed the blood electrification and tested negative, but they did not complete all of the lab work subsequent to testing negative. 11 people didn't finish the protocol due to the study being stopped. Of these 11, all of their malaria loads were reduced, but not negative. 3 people's records weren't complete so we cannot use the details. 1 person was removed from the study before beginning because they also had typhoid and due to the parameters of the study they could not be included with the study. An important note is that the majority of people testing negative showed negative between day 3 and day 7 testing. Also, virtually everyone had a significant reduction or elimination of symptoms on day 3. This study is by no means conclusive, however we feel it has given us some good information as to the possible effectiveness of blood electrification as per Bob Beck with malaria. We are very much interested in continuing the research in this area, and are doing our best at finding funds that may be available to us now that we have an indication of the effectiveness. We have other research projects that are in the beginning administrative stages. Once completed we will release the information.

DONATIONS: SOTA has also been donating units to a few organizations in Africa. One such group operates out of remote villages in South Africa. They have approximately 90 health care workers that go out into the villages, trying to help people. SOTA sent them several units touse in the villages. We have not had a lot of feedback from them...you can imagine how difficult communication is between third world conditions in these villages and our ultra-modern society. However the feedback we get always touches our hearts. We are planning on sending a unit for each of their health care workers so that they will be able to help more individiuals. We have recently designed a unit for those in economically poor countries so they can afford what we consider the most important part of the BECK Protocol?blood electrification. We have been told that people in the villages line up to use the units. The blood electrification units have to be shared and so go on to the next worker in another village. Unfortunately this means the treatment gets stopped prematurely in each village. For this reason we are going to send one unit per heatlh care worker. Thank you again Spectrum for being so interested in the BECK Protocol. In today's world there are so many gifts we have been given that can help us...we only need to have the desire to seek them. Thank you, Russell Torlage and Lesley Punt SOTA Instruments Inc. http://www.sotainstruments.com




1. Cancers Linked to Infectious Agents
2. Cancer Virus Evidence
3. Liver Cancer: HBsAg Virus
4. Suggested Experiments
5. Breast Cancer Virus
6. Cervical Cancer: Caused by Human Papilloma Virus
7. Kaposi's Sarcoma: Caused by Herpes Virus
8. SV40 Virus Causes Rare Cancers in Humans
9. More Microbe-Cancer Links
10. Is Any Cancer Not Caused by a Virus?

1 Cancer Linked to Infectious Agents According to the Center for Disease Control, "Infectious agents are known or suspected to play a role in a number of ... forms of cancer." 54 Infectious organisms include bacteria, chlamydia, fungi, parasites, prions, rickettsias, viruses and others. [ 74 ] Cancer Virus Evidence Is there any evidence that viruses in particular cause cancer? Yes, several. Liver, Breast, Cervical and others. According to Scientific American, "Over the past 20 years... investigators have not only proved that many different types of cancer indeed stem from viruses, bacteria or parasites, they have also learned that perhaps as many as 15 percent of the world's cancer deaths can be traced to them." 92 Liver Cancer: HBsAg Virus Suspected to Play a Role "High rates of liver cancer have been described in the Alaska Native population [Heyward et al 1981] and the role of infection with hepatitis B virus in the development of primary liver cancer has also been observed [Alward et al 1985]. One study in this population estimated the relative risk of developing primary liver cancer of HBsAg-positive carriers to be 148 times that of non-carriers [McMahon et al 1990]."

54 Breast Cancer: Strong Link to Human Mammary Tumor Virus .LOS ANGELES, Posted 12:45 p.m. August 13, 1999 -- A researcher has found a strong link between a virus and breast cancer, a major breakthrough in the search for a cause to the disease. Scientists are calling the virus the human mammary tumor virus, reported CBS 2 News. In mice and other animals, it's long been known that a virus can cause breast cancer, said the television station. But it was only recently that researchers identified a similar virus in human breasts. The scientists found the virus present in 85 percent of all human breast cancers. It's only found in 20 percent of healthy breasts. "I think this is very intriguing because it is another virus linked to human cancer," said Dr. Martin Kast, of Loyola University. "Something is going on." The theory is the virus attaches to cells and transforms their DNA. Those cells then start dividing uncontrollably, said CBS 2 News. So if breast cancer is caused by a virus, it might one day be preventable with a vaccine, the television station reported. Similar vaccines for other cancers are already being developed. Researchers at Kast's Loyola laboratory are working on a vaccine for cervical cancer, a tumor proven to be caused by a virus. If the same proof is found for breast cancer, a simple shot might one day prevent that disease. Doctors believe the cancer is passed down genetically from parents to children. There are other contributing factors for breast cancer, but the virus could be the most important. 63 Something is going on. We have viruses implicated in liver cancer [ 64 ] and now we have a "strong link" to breast cancer. [ 63 65 ]

Cervical Cancer: Caused by Human Papilloma Virus"The WHO's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified HPV infection as "carcinogenic" to humans (HPV types 16 and 1, "probably" carcinogenic (HPV types 31 and 33) and "possibly" carcinogenic (other HPV types except 6 and 11)" 80 81 More than 95% of all Cervical Cancer cases can be attributed to three types of human papilloma virus (HPV) the virus that causes genital warts. Here's how it works: In humans and animals, cell division is regulated largely by two proteins, Rb and p53 [ 82 ]. Two genes in HPV, the "E6" and "E7" genes, produce proteins that can attach to Rb and p53. When the viral gene proteins attach to Rb and p53, they block their effect on regulating cell division. Infected cells then reproduce without any control. (Massimi and Banks 1997). 75 76 78 The American Cancer Society calls HPV a "risk factor" which is somewhat curious in light of the fact that HPV-16 and HPV-18 are classified as "carcinogenic" and the causative model is crystal clear. Good luck finding the word "virus" on the American Cancer Society web site.

Kaposi's Sarcoma: Caused by Herpes Virus Type 8 "Patients with AIDS often develop a type of cancer called Kaposi's Sarcoma. Recent research has discovered that a virus, called Human Herpes Virus type 8 (HHV8) causes these cancers." 66

SV40 Monkey Virus Causes Rare Cancers in Humans "In 1955, Jonas Salk performed a medical miracle when he discovered how to mass produce polio vaccine by growing it on the kidneys of rhesus monkeys. While there is no question that thousands were saved from the ravages of polio by the Salk vaccine, by 1960 a problem had surfaced..."According to CNN, "... An estimated 10 to 30 percent of the (polio) vaccine given to humans between 1955 and 1963 was contaminated with the ( cancer causing SV40 monkey) virus, exposing between 10 to 30 million Americans."According to the same CNN article, there is strong evidence that simian virus-40 (SV40) "... results in a number of rare cancers including non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; mesothelioma, a rare form of cancer found in the sac lining the chest or abdomen; osteosarcoma, a type of bone cancer most often occuring in children; and ependymoma, a rare form of brain tumor." SV40 SIDE NOTE: One article I found says the Lancet published clear evidence that the polio vaccine "planted the seeds of a deadly cancer that kills over 20,000 people every year in the US." According to one site, "... SV-40 was introduced into the general population via polio vaccines starting in the 1950's. Since that is after the time of Rife's discovery of the BX and BY cancer-causing viruses we can assume that other frequencies may be needed to kill these newer viruses.

"More Microbe - Cancer Links According to one researcher, an article in Business Week July 14th 1997 listed cancer links to various viruses, and bacteria, and parasites.virus cancer type Retrovirus (HTLV-2) Hairy-cell leukemia Papillomaviruses (HPV-5,HPV-8,HPV-17) Skin cancer Epstein- Barr virus (EBV) Burketts Lymphomab naso pharyngeal cancer Hepatitis B Virus Liver Cancer bacteria cancer type Helicobacter Pylori Stomach Cancer B. Burgdorferi Skin and Breast cancer Is Any Cancer Not Caused by a Virus? We still hear that "Most human cancers are not caused by virues." 66 Upon what data is that conclusion based? In other words, is it simply our inability to detect fragile viruses with current techniques that causes this assertion?The American Cancer Society says the cause of cancer is currently unknown. They say that with lung cancer, for example, smoking is a risk factor. Can we be certain, however, that even with lung cancer there is not a dormant virus causing tumors when lung tissues are weakened to a certain point? This would explain why not all smokers get cancer. But the society gets large donations fron the pharmaceutical companies which would explain why they dont want to mention it.


info credit goes to those mentioned in the links provided.
i did not do this research, and i take no credit for it.
i merely relay the information.

[Chewie]

Hell naw, I'm not reading that. At least not without proper paragraphs etc.

[ChasingChickens]

reminds me, term paper to write, I'll read that after I finish my paper.

[MysticFalcon182]

Ditto.

[Icanneverwin]

omg -.- so much to read so little... attention span...........................
Hello mister. BX

[ATOMICMAN]

words...

[Tridge]

ummm its quite possibly the cure for AIDS, and many other viruses.
it also contains information linking various cancers to viruses. (possible cure for cancer as well...?)

[Hellfireclanx]

without table 8 and the reverse transcriptase activity chart, no one will be able to comprehend the blood electrification results!!!


yep... didn't read that

i liked the use of in the middle though

[just shdw]

doode... u made me nautious thinking i had to read all that lol.

[B[x]]

tridge, i read most of the first block of text but my eyes started hurting so i had to stop for now. it seems that there are many sets of data in that post that should be separate instead of being mashed together, could you please skip lines between each new set of information?

also, that's enough of the "omg so many letters" posts. we all know that it's a lot of information to read (hell, it says so in the title), we don't need every member of 101 stating so. if you feel that it's too much to read, don't read it, click the back button now.

[xX_marie_Xx]

[VoicesLLD]

[Hellfireclanx]

eh i dunno what it means either, i was sorta fucked up last night...

but anyway when theres a cure for AIDs, I'll celebrate. there were "possible" cures years ago

i'm not making fun of a cure for aids or whatever, and if he wants to tell us about one thats awesome
but it looks like hes posted a giant research paper that he hasn't read, and a bunch of stuff no one else is going to take the time to sort out... just look at everyone elses respond to his post

maybe some understand everything from the passing of 50 to 100 microamperes of simple d.c. electrical current to Rife's discovery of the BX and BY cancer-causing viruses. Unfortunantely not everyone here is a scientist, so if you can post a CNN article next time that would be great. Until then voices can you enlighten us with a translation? it seems like you are the only one here that didn't have a problem understanding the human T lymphoblastoid cell line named H9. Yet you don't get my post (neither do I though, i'll tell some people what happened last night when I get on d2 )

[GODZ!]

you don't have to nkow what everything is to understand the idea...

i though it was great and braeking news being released into public and damn them pharmacy companies.

this is wonderful information and all i could think about through it all is, i hope the world knows this.

thanks for posting it.

[VoicesLLD]

when did i claim to know everything, let alone claim to know what the article meant in its entirety? never. dont assume things, they just make you look more ignorant.

by the way, if you took the time to look at the links he posted, youd know he copy and pasted only certain paragraphs, not the entire article.

so lets leave it at this: dont speak, if all you're going to say makes you look ignorant and arrogant.

ps: i was told by tridge via soulseek that the basic translation is: the possible cure for HIV and other viruses such as hepatitis and melaria, etc, is electrifying the blood with such little voltage that the patient wouldnt notice, but would stop cells from reproducing. however, i was able to grasp that concept myself, and i havent taken science past grade 11 (and thats a requirement in my province). so i dont see why anyone else with a basic high school edumacation would have a problem with comprehending the point.