LLD101 Forum Index LLD101
Low Level Dueling in 1.12
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The time now is Tue Apr 30, 2024 3:24 pm
All times are UTC - 8
 Forum index » Off-Topic Section » Off-Topic Discussion
For Intelligent Christians Only.
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic
Page 9 of 11 [157 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 Next
Author Message
Virtuous

Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 1257
BNet Acct/Realm: *Vanished
Offline
0.00 Silvarrr

PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2007 5:39 pm    Post subject:  

Jerkazoid wrote:
whats bothering me most right now is atheists recieve consequences for admitting disbelief, while critisism of faith is religious-prosecution..... :roll: go figure. (this is why i will act like such an ass or perhaps a jerk, now, to give back the same consequences i had to feel for having skeptisism in faith. and i want others who feel the same to do the same.)

the take-no-side agnostic puts lemon juice on my Q.Q wounds.
religon; dont ask, dont tell.


If you were a woman, I would marry you.

My feelings exactly, I usually take the side of the agnostic though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address 
Dao Jones


Joined: 28 Nov 2004
Posts: 2959
BNet Acct/Realm: *Dao_Jones, Bi-Realmsual.
Offline
33.66 Silvarrr

PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2007 5:49 pm    Post subject:  

breakbeatz2 wrote:

I believe that a ball will fall downwards when you drop it. I believe that the milk jug I see actually exists. I believe in many things, and I'm not 100% sure of any of them.

I assume that you also believe the ball will fall downwards even though you aren't 100% sure. So, why do you refuse to take a stance in this debate about God just because you aren't 100% sure?


Because the ball falling and the milk jug existing have two criteria that belief in God does not:

1. Readily observable. I don't need 100% certainty to believe something. What I want, however, is "better than average odds". I can drop a ball or buy a gallon of milk if I so choose. If I need to confirm the veracity of these things I can do so.

2. Necessarily relevant to my life. Gravity and dairy products are aspects of existence which I make use of. Therefore, it is important to me to have definitive stances on these things. Believing in God is less crucial to my life, as is my opinion of French people. In these areas, I don't form concrete opinions simply because it isn't necessary to do so in order to live my life. I have opinions, of course, but the need to commit just isn't there.

Quote:

When someone asks you whether DiCaprio is a god awful actor nowdays I assume you say "no" since it is your current opinion. It's ridiculous to refrain from ever stating an opinion just because it may change in the future.


An opinion isn't a belief. Frankly, I am of the opinion that there is some sort of higher power, but I am completely unsure of what it is. Perhaps it's the Christian God. Perhaps it's space aliens. Perhaps it's some sort of universal "force". Try as I might I cannot convince myself that *any* of these possibilities is probably or even likely. So, my tenative opinion is "yes, there is a God", and "God" is my placeholder statement for the uncertainty that comes of my (and the human race's) ignorance on the subject.

Quote:

Well religion is something that influences all of us. It influences us in our personal lives and also the direction of our country as a whole. I think it's something that we want to get right.


Whether or not I "believe" is irrelevant to my opinion on the social value of organized religion. Frankly, I'm of the belief that organized religion has done more damage to the world than it ever has done good. People commit horrible atrocities in the name of their deity, and religion has been used to enslave cultures since time immeasurable. But this has less to do with God than it has to do with man. Truthfully, there's nothing "wrong" with religion at all. The problem lies with both the people stupid enough to accept it without question, and the people who use religion to abuse power and control the masses.

_________________

The New LLD101 splash page (Props to Shieron)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website 
Goky

Joined: 18 Feb 2006
Posts: 1425
Offline
1.68 Silvarrr

PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2007 6:06 pm    Post subject:  

Jerkazoid wrote:
whats bothering me most right now is atheists recieve consequences for admitting disbelief, while critisism of faith is religious-prosecution..... Rolling Eyes go figure. (this is why i will act like such an ass or perhaps a jerk, now, to give back the same consequences i had to feel for having skeptisism in faith. and i want others who feel the same to do the same.)


Atheists persecuted? When? Where? (Hint: "THEY SAID A PRAYER NEAR ME. MY RIGHTS HAVE BEEN VIOLATED!" doesn't count as persecution) There's a rather healthy population of atheists and agnostics in America, and you seem to have some severe persecution complex. Feeling victimized is fun and all, but seriously, we all have problems.

I know it's an anecdotal example, but I was a hardcore militant extremely vocal MUST CONVERT ALL CHRISTIANS TO ATHEISM guy all through high school, in a small town (pop: 4000) in southern Virginia in the heart of the Bible belt. Never once did anyone give me a hard time about it, aside from telling me I was being annoying when I would somehow interject my religious hatred into every single situation possible. For the most part everyone just ignored me. If you count that as "persecution", then you might want to look around at the world for a while.

Honestly, so many militant atheists seem to think that everyone in the world is hardcore religious except for them and a select few (including myself a few years ago). For me now, looking around with a slightly less clouded head, it's pretty easy to realize that a very SMALL percentage of Americans actually actively practice some religion. Sure, they might pray when their life is going bad, say something about a "better place" when someone dies, and go to church on Easter, but if you really think most Americans that you view as "religious" actually live their day-to-day lives any different than you and have drastically different ideals from yours, then you might want to take a step back and rethink things. (Well, not all ideals. I don't think most people are convinced there's some sort of grand war going on and we're a few years from breaking out the m-16's.)

Last edited by Goky on Wed May 09, 2007 6:47 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
Jerkazoid


Joined: 06 Feb 2004
Posts: 2902
BNet Acct/Realm: wscl
Offline
4.86 Silvarrr

PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2007 6:42 pm    Post subject:  

Goky wrote:

Atheists persecuted?


i was not trying to insinuate i was hanged or burned, i said "consequences"
just bc i wont list specifics doesnt mean favortism with job or social niche is not there.

ill remark on the neutrality of your retort, (wich i question)..... it seems you have experience with consequences in which you blame yourself.
i can take blame; can you trust me on that?

but it means ALOT to have a large part of your character not in common with a vast majority. And when someone goes "Well that IS interesting, but your wrong." when they brought up the question themselves, it is offensive.

i have been turned down for lifes oppurtunities bc i was agnostic. i have also had people make "important" requests of me bc of their faith. my poor performance was "disapointing" and i was responsible for my "un-faith". i have had efforts ignored, good deeds refused and qualified advice (even in the work place) forgotten. favortism in general and i have seen and heard about alot of it, and all bc of god.

fine.

so i take a stance against the consequences i had to endure in the lords name(s).... (reformed to atheisim) and i want others to join and establish authority, secular and neutral to create buisness who (like, Walmart for instance), act with hidden personal politics shaping this country


its called pushing-back
and it wont be for truth.
it will just be for what i feel is right, after all, what a person "feels" cant be wrong. Laughing (and not things that violate human rights, duh!)

so when agnostics sit as bystanders and go "well what does it matter."
it makes a difference, bc it will always hurt the under dog

_________________
Magic missile doesn't kill people, wizards who cast magic missile kill people.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
zarc

Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Posts: 865
BNet Acct/Realm: USEast NonLadder *fyarbeast USEast Ladder *fyarbeast1
Offline
-2.48 Silvarrr

PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 6:22 am    Post subject:  

being agnostic is saying "i dont want to be wrong so im not going to choose until i have to" its a lame way of trying to cater to all the religious needs
_________________

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address 
Jerkazoid


Joined: 06 Feb 2004
Posts: 2902
BNet Acct/Realm: wscl
Offline
4.86 Silvarrr

PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 6:38 am    Post subject:  

fyarbeast wrote:
being agnostic is saying "i dont want to be wrong so im not going to choose until i have to" its a lame way of trying to cater to all the religious needs


i dont want to got that far on the agnostics, but it does get to that point at times.

But for the sake of the argument the fulcrum im drawing is indeed a black and white scenario;

would you choose an evangelical (or strongly spiritual) presidant or a secular one?

_________________
Magic missile doesn't kill people, wizards who cast magic missile kill people.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
Dao Jones


Joined: 28 Nov 2004
Posts: 2959
BNet Acct/Realm: *Dao_Jones, Bi-Realmsual.
Offline
33.66 Silvarrr

PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 9:54 am    Post subject:  

fyarbeast wrote:
being agnostic is saying "i dont want to be wrong so im not going to choose until i have to" its a lame way of trying to cater to all the religious needs


No, you're wrong. Here's three seconds of free research:

wikipedia.com wrote:
Agnostics claim either that it is not possible to have absolute or certain knowledge of God or gods; or, alternatively, that while certainty may be possible, they personally have no knowledge. Agnosticism in both cases involves some form of skepticism.


Here's the whole article. Go ahead and disprove that position. Provide me with absolute or even certain knowledge of the existence or absence of God. Can't, can you? So why is my willing open-mindedness and actual adherance to factual reasoning "lame" compared to your blind conviction in something you can't prove?

Again - people should do a little research before they pass judgement. As an agnostic myself, I find people who DO choose their side in the absence of any real knowledge to be "lame". They believe or don't believe in a God based on guesses and supposition. With that sort of silly illogical "faith" you're actually worse off than if you just accepted the milk jug as your personal savior. I mean, at least you can drink out of a milk jug. And the milk jug can answer prayers, so long as the prayer involves being able to drink milk. But that's one more guaranteed prayer than God can grant you. Very Happy

Having an open mind about things > "unwavering belief" in something.

Quote:
would you choose an evangelical (or strongly spiritual) president or a secular one?


No doubt: a secular one. Secular presidents tend to think, whereas heavily religious presidents are content to just believe.

_________________

The New LLD101 splash page (Props to Shieron)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website 
Virtuous

Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 1257
BNet Acct/Realm: *Vanished
Offline
0.00 Silvarrr

PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 12:59 pm    Post subject:  

[quote=Sean]I agree 100% with Dawkins that the religious indoctrination of children is a form of psychological abuse. Where I run into problems is when I try to imagine how public policy should change to reflect this. It just seems very problematic on a practical level.[/quote]

http://toddshammer.wordpress.com/2007/05/06/brainwashing-children-and-religion/



Some people sware by their souls that walking under a ladder brings bad luck. Some people would give their life if they were disproven that breaking a mirror gives bad luck.

And teaching children things that have no evidence to back it up?
There is no dispute on whether or not Muslims will give their lives for their god (9/11 for example). They believe whole-heartily that they are right. Just the same way Christians believe they are right.

Atheists recieve criticism all the time; I think that's what Jerkazoid meant.

(off topic)
By the way, I'm doing a statistical survey of math texts to prove that the number 2 is the most common mathematical answer. Razz

_________________
East Ladder: *Vanished
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address 
TacoBell

Joined: 18 Jul 2005
Posts: 223
Offline
0.00 Silvarrr

PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 1:39 pm    Post subject:  

Quote:
There is no dispute on whether or not Muslims will give their lives for their god (9/11 for example)


Weird, because I could have sworn that the Qur'an doesn't promote this type of violence. Last I checked it wasn't the religion that encourages this type of behavior, but rather the people taking passages out of context and/or misinterpreting it for whatever reason.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
Virtuous

Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 1257
BNet Acct/Realm: *Vanished
Offline
0.00 Silvarrr

PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 3:19 pm    Post subject:  

Excuse my socially inherited bias.


Even the bible says to kill all non-believers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address 
Jerkazoid


Joined: 06 Feb 2004
Posts: 2902
BNet Acct/Realm: wscl
Offline
4.86 Silvarrr

PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 5:07 pm    Post subject:  

i think the texts people read was just written by people.. they can pick and choose, interpret, and all in spite of contrary evidance or democratic thought....
so whatever it says is irrelavent, its really the actions and consequences we can measure that make the religon
(i ignore that idealist notion about faiths basis, or history being the crucial part.)

i just saw the public broadcast on the daily show with the Mickey mouse knock-off talking with the littel girl about martyrdom. it was a private palestinian broadcast (which i dont doubt) and it represents a small extremists circle. but the force with wich they operate creates a bigger influence... (force wins) over the other groups who, (possibly), dont do much to stop them.

we have what? 6 huge diff sects to chrisitanity all with differences? it
doesnt matter how many times i read the bible, its still weird to have superstition open for debate, that has no basis in evidance, control policies

the point is;
you can have a few people who do bad things make choices that hurt SO many people, and over faith. faith, wich again has no basis in repeatable, measurable evidance (why choose 1 super natural over another?) and is open for arbitrary interpretation and can/will operate in spite of contrary facts. Such a greater danger then just saying "enough! im going scientific."

Dao in the black and white scenario you chose secular politics. I choose the same (obviously) however i now fail to see how a carefull open mind will bring about that lesser evil.
this is why i no longer take such an apologetic open discussion about faith, i was REALLY trying to work at being an ass to make the point as strong and real as possible. (perhaps a forum was the worst place to try that on)

imo its time for some great change and i want to help people like Dawkings.

i dont want americans to feel ashamed or carefull about establishing their beilef in secular living, buisness and politics.
We have felt consequences bc its not a protected organized religon, its ok to push us back and ignore claims with a shielded umbrella of faith... and thats just wrong to me.

though seperation of church and state was only implied in the constitution (EDIT*excuse me* Note; "establishment clause" under the 1st amendment , it does define the separation) understand that America was founded by those who saw how crazy politics got when it held hands with religon.

ill stand up like the ass in my own colbert way and say it more;
DO what you think is right
DONT be obligated to appease the faithful
Dont be ashamed to be Atheist and stand out against the spiritual fronts that try to guide our judgement.
pick a side; for the supernatural or not. (the lesser evil?)

i have a new god policy; Dont ask, dont tell.

_________________
Magic missile doesn't kill people, wizards who cast magic missile kill people.


Last edited by Jerkazoid on Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:26 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
Mr_Bilson


Joined: 25 Dec 2005
Posts: 257
Offline
0.00 Silvarrr

PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 5:25 pm    Post subject:  

Quote:
(off topic)
By the way, I'm doing a statistical survey of math texts to prove that the number 2 is the most common mathematical answer.


number 1 is most popular Smile

_________________
~sooperman~
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
zarc

Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Posts: 865
BNet Acct/Realm: USEast NonLadder *fyarbeast USEast Ladder *fyarbeast1
Offline
-2.48 Silvarrr

PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 5:27 pm    Post subject:  

by "lame" i meant "weak"...make sense now?
_________________

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address 
Jerkazoid


Joined: 06 Feb 2004
Posts: 2902
BNet Acct/Realm: wscl
Offline
4.86 Silvarrr

PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 5:37 pm    Post subject:  

i really did me consequences.. though critisism happens as well.

faithfull friends will declare evolution or science is just another faith and probably wrong anyway. And how dare they tell me what to beileve Razz

the two are completely indepandant
you cant argue against faith with science, so therefore you cant argue against science with faith Laughing

by the way the most common number is actually the number "C"
and its also for "cookie", thats good enough for me <munch munch munch>

_________________
Magic missile doesn't kill people, wizards who cast magic missile kill people.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message 
dragonfire_god

Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 2117
BNet Acct/Realm: US East NL SC
Offline
2.22 Silvarrr

PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 7:16 pm    Post subject:  

Virtuous wrote:
Excuse my socially inherited bias.


Even the bible says to kill all non-believers.



Quote it?

_________________
In the fell clutch of circumstance
I have not winced nor cried aloud.
Under the bludgeonings of chance
My head is bloody, but unbowed.

Its Not The Strong Who Survive But The Survivors Who Are Strong.

The insanity of my sin bodes within.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 9 of 11 [157 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic
 Forum index » Off-Topic Section » Off-Topic Discussion
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.4070s ][ Queries: 50 (0.3467s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]