Author |
Message |
ATOMICMAN
Official LLD101 Drunkard
Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2740 BNet Acct/Realm: *ATOMICMAN-LLD USEastNL Retired
0.00 Silvarrr
|
Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 1:09 pm Post subject:
fine system? |
|
dunno maybe institute a fine system for various bad doings...
ie: fines for not following trade forum rules (give like a 3 strikes and yer out) fines for excessive spamming and other such annoying things
fines could be like forum gold (if it gets put to use), lld currency, or gold all to be used for site sponsored events as rewards or contest prizes or no d2 related events
seen a few forums use this (not just for d2) and seems to keep peeps in check and has some nice benifets...
_________________
I am the bullet in the gun
I am the truth from which you run
I am a silencing machine
I am the end of all your dreams...
|
Back to top
|
|
|
VoicesLLD
Joined: 09 Mar 2004 Posts: 7401 BNet Acct/Realm: Recovering WoW addict.
0.00 Silvarrr
|
Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 2:05 pm Post subject:
|
|
getting their trade thread locked, is punishment enough for not following a rule. constant disreguard of the trade rules gives them a week ban from the trade forum.
spam and flaming is deleted for the most part, unless we keep it to use as evidence for a ban later on, so there is no "my word vs your word" scenarios later on.
_________________
|
Back to top
|
|
|
jdb-lld
Joined: 01 Aug 2004 Posts: 136 BNet Acct/Realm: usueast nl
0.00 Silvarrr
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 2:04 pm Post subject:
|
|
i agree, i think their topic getting locked is enough humiliation, if u can't follow a few simple rules, i'm sry 4 u.
|
Back to top
|
|
|
GODZ!
Victim of the BAN BLUDGEON
Joined: 22 Feb 2004 Posts: 3623 BNet Acct/Realm: ECWK
0.00 Silvarrr
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 6:15 pm Post subject:
|
|
but then who would define spam. maybe a biased forum mod would missuse? Would you concider that fair then?
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Icanneverwin
Joined: 30 Apr 2004 Posts: 1715 BNet Acct/Realm: *Disc0nnect
1.49 Silvarrr
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 6:16 pm Post subject:
|
|
spam comes in a can and taste a bit salty =\ we need a little spam here and there to get across the point that it is annoyin....
_________________ No faith, No hope.
~Destined for Disappointment~
--------------------------------------------------
1000th post:Thu Sep 15, 2005 10:54 pm
1337st post:Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:06 am
|
Back to top
|
|
|
VoicesLLD
Joined: 09 Mar 2004 Posts: 7401 BNet Acct/Realm: Recovering WoW addict.
0.00 Silvarrr
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 7:48 pm Post subject:
|
|
GODZ_llds wrote: | but then who would define spam. maybe a biased forum mod would missuse? Would you concider that fair then? |
i dont see any biased forum mods on this forum. you must be thinking of some other one. maybe you should go frequent there more often than here.
_________________
|
Back to top
|
|
|
GODZ!
Victim of the BAN BLUDGEON
Joined: 22 Feb 2004 Posts: 3623 BNet Acct/Realm: ECWK
0.00 Silvarrr
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:08 am Post subject:
|
|
lets not be so selfish. I said that for in any instance would anyone not concider that fair? Thats the only problem i think would occur in a system like this.
|
Back to top
|
|
|
VoicesLLD
Joined: 09 Mar 2004 Posts: 7401 BNet Acct/Realm: Recovering WoW addict.
0.00 Silvarrr
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 1:53 pm Post subject:
|
|
if we did impliment a fine system for spamming and such, if you made a post and thought "i might get fined for this", maybe you shouldnt be making the post in the first place? what is considered spam is pretty damn obvious (but ican gave you an example, incase someone didnt know), and anyone who doesnt know what spam is, is clueless.
_________________
|
Back to top
|
|
|
GODZ!
Victim of the BAN BLUDGEON
Joined: 22 Feb 2004 Posts: 3623 BNet Acct/Realm: ECWK
0.00 Silvarrr
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 2:00 pm Post subject:
|
|
we all know that, but what im saying is, what if some mod really really hated one person and just said everything they did was spam, for example.
I don't care about grudges against me, for all the bugging there is i think you guys are pretty fair, but what if later on in the line a situation like that happend. thats the only reason i would concider the fine system rational.
|
Back to top
|
|
|
VoicesLLD
Joined: 09 Mar 2004 Posts: 7401 BNet Acct/Realm: Recovering WoW addict.
0.00 Silvarrr
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 2:08 pm Post subject:
|
|
honestly, i dont even know what you're trying to say now.
_________________
|
Back to top
|
|
|
B[x]
Joined: 04 May 2004 Posts: 6130 BNet Acct/Realm: Retired
0.00 Silvarrr
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 4:45 pm Post subject:
|
|
he's basically saying that if a moderador doesn't like a specific person, the mod can just claim that whatever the person says is spam and "fine" him.
however, moderators didn't become who they are because they are petty and selfish so i don't think this would be much of a problem. i mean, it's not like we go around saying "hey, that new guy's got a cool name, let's make him a mod!!". however, that is how i was taken onboard, my cool name. anyway, we don't do that anymore.
_________________
[Important Links]
|
Back to top
|
|
|
VoicesLLD
Joined: 09 Mar 2004 Posts: 7401 BNet Acct/Realm: Recovering WoW addict.
0.00 Silvarrr
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 5:04 pm Post subject:
|
|
we took you on because you have a common name. not a cool name. granted they both start with C, david, but that is as far as the similiarities go.
^ i would be fined for that. ^
_________________
|
Back to top
|
|
|
B[x]
Joined: 04 May 2004 Posts: 6130 BNet Acct/Realm: Retired
0.00 Silvarrr
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 5:12 pm Post subject:
|
|
lol, i meant "B[x]", not "david".
^ fine.
_________________
[Important Links]
|
Back to top
|
|
|
GODZ!
Victim of the BAN BLUDGEON
Joined: 22 Feb 2004 Posts: 3623 BNet Acct/Realm: ECWK
0.00 Silvarrr
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 8:11 pm Post subject:
|
|
-1 for both, the problem would be it seems, we would need a new fine mod unless you guys are willing to take the fines to fine.
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|